However,
I often wonder if the results of my recent shoots are leaning more towards standard commercial photography, and less towards creating original "art". Do most of you feel that the direction I'm taking now is still postured towards being defined as "art", or is it geared more towards commercial photography? Is there a difference? I know that with every shoot I usually have an original idea that I want to accomplish, even if it's just something simple. I'm still as passionate as ever about the craft, does it still show?
I guess what I'm asking is this: Is fashion photography, or whatever it is that I'm doing, still considered Art here?



The Grandfather Mountain Photographer's Retreat is less than two months away... so expect some landscape/nature work in the not-so-distant future...









--
Nick: The only good thing about that movie was when Nicholas Cage took off his shirt!
*SILENCE AT THE LUNCH TABLE*
Allie: Wow, way to come out, Nick.
--
The only thing necessary for the triumph of Evil is for good men to do nothing
--
Hummmm...!!!!
I really
--
Kind regards,
Frank
Enjoy my last News Article 'Finest Macro, Nature and Invertebrates in Squares'
--
Do not follow where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
----
www.frakkr-photos.nl
----
--
Main art gallery *Quaddles-Roost
My stock gallery *quaddles
Husband`s gallery *quaddie
CLUBS
~DeviantHerps~fungi-club~WildlifeUK*Insect-Lovers-Club*naturephotographer~BigCats=Birds-Club=Fujifilm-Club
--
The only thing necessary for the triumph of Evil is for good men to do nothing
--
Joseph Hawk ~ [link]
Previous Page12345...Next Page